week 0 - continuation

[vicedirector]

seven vices week 0 ♫ tuesday - sunday With that revelation, things are sure to be more tense--or maybe, you prefer to go the hope route? Either way, the atmosphere of the town begins changing ever so subtly. Once in a while, you can feel someone staring at you from behind, though when you turn to check, no one will be there. Footsteps can also be heard echoing when one stands close to the void, even when alone....of course, no one will be there, either. As of Tuesday, extra food will be found in the kitchen. The ingredients are very based in Western cuisine: rye and wheat bread, potatoes, cabbage, beets, onions, cucumbers, assorted mushrooms, and the like are all supplied. In addition, there are also miscellaneous spices, eggs, milk, and an abundance of fish and pork. Various dishes made with the above ingredients will also be set out for anyone to take during lunch and dinner. A copy of the rulebook has been pinned to the front of the chapel, and a wooden sign now stands at the east edge of town near the clinic: Welcome to Lebensbaum | EST. 1623 | Population: ♜♜♜♜♜♜♜. The bonfire will be lit every night from 10PM to 6AM, after which it will extinguish on its own. >Mingle? This is the last open mingle for Week 0. No motives will be given until next Monday, and thus no murders will occur. Enjoy your last week of safety! When posting toplevels, specify the time and location. If you plan on having any private conversations between characters, remember to let us know in the post linked below. cast setting rulebook profiles private conversations

Comments

[hopefragment]

We could. I almost wonder if it isn't a bad idea to pair up at night... or if that would just make it easier to become a victim.

[Hm.]

Even in groups of three, the rules permit at least two people to be killed. And if it's more than that... you run the risk of having an accomplice. Following the rules, that means they can kill up to four people, since it seems to be based on individuals. The more people that are together, the higher up that goes until we're right back in the same situation again.

[earie]

At least if we have two people watching out and one of them dies, we'll definitely know who did it. We can, like, avenge them and stuff after. [ Obviously they have two different mentalities on this. ] I don't see the problem.

[hopefragment]

No, it's not a bad idea. That might be incentive not to kill, too. It sounds like some people might need that more than others.

Don't forget the rules though: killing in self-defense is considered just the same as killing with intent. I don't want to see anyone murdered or executed.

But... it's really not a bad idea, if you can get enough people to go along with it.